HYBW Relationship Anarchy
Hi friends my name is Tris and this is No Boilerplate, where I focus on fast, technical videos.

RELATIONSHIP ANARCHY
A lesson that I suspect many parents and teachers are already hoping to instil in the young people in their care is: No one is ALWAYS more important than anyone else, and no relationship is ALWAYS more important than any other.
This received wisdom comes in many forms, "don't forget your mates when you get a girlfriend" would be an example, but so would "Don't let your parents dictate whom you choose to marry".
These might seem like common sense, but society actually has VERY specific ideas about which relationships are more important than others.
And as anyone who has learned chemistry after high school will tell you, sometimes you have to unlearn everything you had been taught for your entire life to improve.
Relationship Anarchy provides an alternative lens for us here, but first we must ask ourselves, do we know what anarchy is?
WHAT IS ANARCHY?

Abolish:
- authority
- coercion
- hierarchy
in our political process
> Political Anarchism is a philosophy and movement that seeks to abolish authority, coercion, and hierarchy in our political process.
Political anarchy questions inherent hierarchies in society:
- kings and subjects
- lords and serfs
- bosses / eployees
- rich / poor
Asking especially why having some people in power over other people is so highly valued in our society.
WHAT IS RELATIONSHIP ANARCHY?

Abolish:
- authority
- coercion
- hierarchy
in our interpersonal relationships
> Relationship Anarchism is a philosophy that seeks to abolish authority, coercion, and hierarchy in interpersonal relationships.
Relationship Anarchy questions inherent hierarchies in our relationships, especially why romantic relationships are so highly valued in our society over all other kinds.

"NO GODS, NO MASTERS"
vs

"OH GOD, YES MASTER"
Anarchy rejects hierarchy in our political process, relationship anarchy rejects hierarchy in our relationships with each other.
Are we clear? An-archy; Against heirarchy.
Thank you for your patience, boring time over.
FULL DISCLOSURE:
I'M A STRAIGHT WHITE CIS MAN
IN A HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE
(ie "easy mode")
Full disclosure: I wrote this video to introduce you to this important, yet inherently queer topic.
Please understand that I'm not speaking from experience, but a hyperfocused sidequest deep-dive I went down while researching mental health topics for my podcast, Lost Terminal!
I have provided links to books, articles, and other vides by queer experts in the field for you to engage with further, and I recommend you do.
AMATONORMATIVITY
(the societal assumption that everyone prospers with one exclusive romantic relationship[1])
As we move through our lives, we are surrounded by bad relationship examples, in books, films, online, and even in our parents and teachers.
I don't blame them, they're just doing the best they can, following society's default path that Relationship Anarchists name "The Relationship Escalator":
Tool # 1:
THE RELATIONSHIP ESCALATOR

Image credit: Nick Roberts, The Washington Post
This is the first tool I want to tell you about today
Society seems to have this rule that EVERY romantic relationship MUST follow this exact route:
- Meet
- Date
- Exclusive
- Move in together
- Get married
- Share finances
- Have/adopt children
- Retire
- Die
It's called an "Escalator" because once you're on the bottom step, you are pulled UP by society, even if you're very comfortable where you are, thank you very much. Or perhaps you'd like to slow down, or return to a previous, comfortable, level, without breaking up and starting all over again, at the bottom.
This metophor is genius, because if you ever try to walk down an 'up' escalator, you don't just have to fight against the will of the machine, but all the people who protest as you push past them, who are saying things like:
"He's not asked you to marry him yet? What a time-waster!"
well-meaning friends
"You guys aren't exclusive? You're obviously not serious about each other."
less-well-meaning friends
"You've been married for 5 years, WHERE ARE MY GRANDCHILDREN?"
well-meaning parents
"I go on too many dates
but I can't make them stay.
(at least that's what people _say...)"_
T. SWIFT, WARRIOR-POET
TAYLOR, darling, who are these "people"? Blink twice if you're under duress.
[Two little lovebirds] sitting in a tree
K-I-S-S-I-N-G!
First comes love
Then comes marriage
Then comes baby in a baby carriage!
Traditional nursery rhyme
- And they start US so young!
- FIRST comes love
- THEN comes marriage
- THEN AND ONLY THEN ARE BABIES AUTHORISED
- and so on, in every film, every song, every hallmark advert. Death by a thousand paper cuts, and we hardly even know we are learning these rules
Please consider my Patreon, especially if you'd like more videos like this, as queer topics are often demonetised here on YouTube.
PATREON.COM/NOBOILERPLATE
- 📼 Early, longer, and more detailed videos
- 👨🏫 1:1 Mentoring over video chat. Email: [email protected]
- ❤️ My infinite gratitude for allowing me to continue making these videos
Thank you! Onward:
SOME BAD RELATIONSHIPS
IN STORIES
Let's look at some case studies, shall we?

(& JACOB)
BELLA & EDWARD
AUDIBLE GASP! Bella can't possibly have complex feelings for TWO guys, that's UNHEARD OF! WHAT CAN SHE, A GOOD MORMON-CODED GIRL, DO?

(and whats-his-name, the evil prince guy)
ANA & KRISTOF
Poor stupid kristof knew that society would judge Ana's possible future relationship with her possible future prince husband as more important than his, a mere peasant's, love

Baz Luhrmann's "Romeo ☩ Juliet" (1996) is THE BEST ADAPTATION FIGHT ME
ROMEO & JULIET
These two star-crossed galazy brain geniuses don't even know each other's NAMES until act 2!

(the set designer and director disagreed about how many candles are in this scene)
The point is, society had a LOT to say about Romeo & Juliet's relationship, but none of it actually helped them.
The lesson is clear: WE MUST TALK TO THE PEOPLE WE ARE IN RELATIONSHIPS WITH, not just make assumptions.
Because:
TRADITIONAL COUPLING
CAN BE HARMFUL?
When we're in love with someone, especially at the start, the romance can feel all-encompassing: This special someone seems to be all we're talking about and thinking about, isn't it good to pour all of our effort and expectations into this person?
Just as we have heard people do in every story ever written?
It's not, and I'll explain using tool #2:
TOOL #2:
THE SMORGASBORD

In a restaurant, a smorgasboard is a buffet of many small items that you can fill you plate with.
A little of this, a little of that. If you don't like meat, no-one is forcing you to have some, if you love olives, take a whole bunch!
It's an alternative to a set menu, where you'll eat what you are served, like it or not.
Relationship Anarchists take all the behaviours that, according to the escalator, previously had to be fulfilled by just one person, and splits them into a buffet that you can use as a conversation starter with your friends, paramours, or messy situationships.
classDiagram
class Emotional-Intimacy {
Sharing vulnerability
Confidante
Words of affection
}
class Physical-Intimacy {
Cuddling
Kissing
Hand-holding
}
class Sexual-Intimacy {
Sexual acts
Sexual talk
Kissing
}
class Companionship {
Playfulness
Shared activity/interests
Friendship
}classDiagram
class Long-term-partnership {
Shared future goals
Commitment
Chosen family
}
class Caregiving {
Receiving care
Giving care
Emergency contact
}
class Co-caregiving {
Sick, disabled, elderly
Adults
Children/animals/plants
}
class Entanglement {
Cohabitation
Finances/legal
Routines & chores
}classDiagram
class Collaberative-Partnership {
Artistic
Business
Teaching
}
class Kink {
Domination/Submission
Sadism/Masochism
Sharing fetishes
}
class Voluntary-Asymmetry {
Sponsor/sponsee
Mentor/guide
Guardian/ward
}
class Social-Partnership {
Public displays of affection
Sharing social circles
Presenting as a social unit
}AN EXAMPLE RELATIONSHIP ANARCHY SMORGASBORD
classDiagram
class Emotional-Intimacy{
Sharing vulnerability
Confidante
Words of affection
}
class Physical-Intimacy:::alice {
Cuddling
Kissing
Hand-holding
}
class Sexual-Intimicy {
Sexual acts
Sexual talk
Kissing
}
class Companionship:::alice {
Playfulness
Shared activity/interests
Friendship
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteclassDiagram
class Long-term-partnership {
Shared future goals
Commitment
Chosen family
}
class Caregiving {
Receiving care
Giving care
Emergency contact
}
class Co-caregiving {
Sick, disabled, elderly
Adults
Children/animals/plants
}
class Entanglement {
Cohabitation
Finances/legal
Routines & chores
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteclassDiagram
class Collaberative-Partnership {
Artistic
Business
Teaching
}
class Kink {
Domination/Submission
Sadism/Masochism
Sharing fetishes
}
class Voluntary-Asymmetry {
Sponsor/sponsee
Mentor/guide
Guardian/ward
}
class Social-Partnership:::alice {
Public displays of affection
Sharing social circles
Presenting as a social unit
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteALICE & BOB
classDiagram
class Emotional-Intimacy:::alice {
Sharing vulnerability
Confidante
Words of affection
}
class Physical-Intimacy:::alice {
Cuddling
Kissing
Hand-holding
}
class Sexual-Intimicy:::alice {
Sexual acts
Sexual talk
Kissing
}
class Companionship:::alice {
Playfulness
Shared activity/interests
Friendship
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteclassDiagram
class Long-term-partnership:::alice {
Shared future goals
Commitment
Chosen family
}
class Caregiving {
Receiving care
Giving care
Emergency contact
}
class Co-caregiving {
Sick, disabled, elderly
Adults
Children/animals/plants
}
class Entanglement {
Cohabitation
Finances/legal
Routines & chores
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteclassDiagram
class Collaberative-Partnership {
Artistic
Business
Teaching
}
class Kink {
Domination/Submission
Sadism/Masochism
Sharing fetishes
}
class Voluntary-Asymmetry {
Sponsor/sponsee
Mentor/guide
Guardian/ward
}
class Social-Partnership:::alice {
Public displays of affection
Sharing social circles
Presenting as a social unit
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteALICE & JANE
classDiagram
class Emotional-Intimacy {
Sharing vulnerability
Confidante
Words of affection
}
class Physical-Intimacy {
Cuddling
Kissing
Hand-holding
}
class Sexual-Intimicy:::spicy {
Sexual acts
Sexual talk
Kissing
}
class Companionship {
Playfulness
Shared activity/interests
Friendship
}
classDef spicy fill:#932727,color:whiteclassDiagram
class Long-term-partnership {
Shared future goals
Commitment
Chosen family
}
class Caregiving {
Receiving care
Giving care
Emergency contact
}
class Co-caregiving {
Sick, disabled, elderly
Adults
Children/animals/plants
}
class Entanglement {
Cohabitation
Finances/legal
Routines & chores
}classDiagram
class Collaberative-Partnership {
Artistic
Business
Teaching
}
class Kink:::spicy {
Domination/Submission
Sadism/Masochism
Sharing fetishes
}
class Voluntary-Asymmetry {
Sponsor/sponsee
Mentor/guide
Guardian/ward
}
class Social-Partnership {
Public displays of affection
Sharing social circles
Presenting as a social unit
}
classDef spicy fill:#932727,color:whiteAN EXAMPLE RELATIONSHIP ANARCHY SMORGASBORD
Just look at the options that are available! Quite a menu.
Most people won't have an appetite for everything here, and that's fine, that's how a menu WORKS!
(some people don't like food that's too spicy and that's the same here! I am not here to kinkshame!)
Having all these topics available to discuss with someone you are in a relationship with, gives you a much richer vocabulary to answer the question "so what are we to each other".
Far more than friend/lover/partner, the only options society tells us are avilable.
For example, Alice and Jane might like sleeping together, but after discussion, don't see themselves moving in or starting a family or caregiving for each other.
Alice and Bob see each other all the time, and they are comfortable with cuddling while watching a movie and holding hands while in social situations, and love their relationship just as it is.
Any of these people might have other relationships that involve other parts of the smorgasboard, and just as you don't check with existing friends before making a new friend - you just do it! RA is optimised for the lovely unexpected.
This all sounds utopic, but there is a darker side of the Smorgasboard, which I touched on earlier:
Under the existing assumptions of the kind of society that unquestioningly accepts the Relationship Escalator, ALL THESE OPTIONS must be fulfilled by EXACTLY ONE person.
What a terrible burden to put on someone, right?
classDiagram
class Emotional-Intimacy:::alice {
Sharing vulnerability
Confidante
Words of affection
}
class Physical-Intimacy:::alice {
Cuddling
Kissing
Hand-holding
}
class Sexual-Intimicy:::alice {
Sexual acts
Sexual talk
Kissing
}
class Companionship:::alice {
Playfulness
Shared activity/interests
Friendship
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteclassDiagram
class Long-term-partnership:::alice {
Shared future goals
Commitment
Chosen family
}
class Caregiving:::alice {
Receiving care
Giving care
Emergency contact
}
class Co-caregiving:::alice {
Sick, disabled, elderly
Adults
Children/animals/plants
}
class Entanglement:::alice {
Cohabitation
Finances/legal
Routines & chores
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteclassDiagram
class Collaberative-Partnership:::alice {
Artistic
Business
Teaching
}
class Kink:::alice {
Domination/Submission
Sadism/Masochism
Sharing fetishes
}
class Voluntary-Asymmetry:::alice {
Sponsor/sponsee
Mentor/guide
Guardian/ward
}
class Social-Partnership:::alice {
Public displays of affection
Sharing social circles
Presenting as a social unit
}
classDef alice fill:#932727,color:whiteTHIS IS TOO MUCH

OPTIMISING FRIENDSHIPS
Quote from: thethinkingasexual.wordpress.com[2]
RA IS ABOUT OPTIMISING FRIENDSHIPS
There's no escalator for friendships because society, in general doesn't place importance on them.
Sex sells but friendships don't.
Isn't that sad?
acexual and aromantic people suffer hugely from this depriotisation of friendships - take away friends and what is left?
As The Thinking Aro says:
"relationship anarchy is fundamentally about community, as much as monogamous and polyamorous lifestyles are fundamentally about the couple.
That doesn’t mean couples can’t exist in relationship anarchy, but it does mean that the focus of a relationship anarchist’s life and emotional energy is not a couple relationship by default, the way it is for monogamists and polyamorists."
PROJECT HAIL MARY

"You have no family. You don't even have a dog."
A clear example of society devaluaing friendship relationships is Project Hail Mary, my film of the year so far:
Because grace has no family, he is expendable, because family are assumed to be more important than him enriching the lives of hundreds of his students
REALITY CHECK
I want to pause at the end here and give a reality check.
It's very normal to place more importance on those we love, families especially.
And because of this, society is rather set up for the two-person double-income household, so much so that having a roommate when renting a flat is assumed behaviour.
Coupling, in one way or another is often the easier choice for people.
RA encompasses these coupled relationships, too, but doesn't accept them as the default or best, and neither should you.
DON'T GUESS: TALK
- Love is abundant, and every relationship is unique
- Love and respect instead of entitlement
- Find your core set of relationship values
- Heterosexism is rampant and out there, but don’t let fear lead you
Build for the lovely unexpected- Fake it til' you make it
- Trust is better
- Change through communication
- Customise your commitments
From "The short instructional manifesto for relationship anarchy", Andie Nordgren
Assumptions are never good, and that counts double in relationships, especially the harmful assumption that your exclusive partner must fulfil everything you require - how could that POSSIBLY be?
Would you want the pressure of fulfilling everything on the smorgasbord for your partner?
And what about the quiet resentment when you inevitably fall short.
RA provides an ethos and framework to talk to the people you are in relationships with without the baggage of society dragging you down.
instead of having romantic partners and friends you just have relationships - defining what each means within them.
You might one day get married, I can highly recommend it!
But if you do so on the strong foundation of communication that RA requires, you will be happier, and your partner will be too.
- And her partner
- And his thruple
- and all friends who you loved along the way.
FANCY A PODCAST?
I'm producing the following RIGHT NOW:
- Near-future Sci-fi
- Hopepunk / Solarpunk
- Extremely British
- Contemporary Urban Fantasy
- Technology blended with magic
- Extremely British
- 1976 Urban Fantasy
- Magical artwork
- Extremely British
- Non-fiction(!)
- Discussion
- Robin & I unpack NB's technical topics
- Extremely British




- Radical Intimacy by Sophie K. Rosa
- Relationship Anarchy: Occupy Intimacy! by Juan-Carlos Pérez-Cortés
- https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/andie-nordgren-the-short-instructional-manifesto-for-relationship-anarchy
- LOADS MORE HERE: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/topic/relationship-anarchy